A26982:292
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 14. I am next therefore further to enquire what this Evidence is.
But his words do seem to forbid an answer, for they are capable of none but what will sound harshly, even to name them as they are Most Impudent Lies, mere forgeries, or the most unquestionable Duties made most odious sins; and most of the pretence fetched from some words of my Writings and Confessions depraved and impudently falsified.
But his words do seem to forbid an answer, for they are capable of none but what will sound harshly, even to name them as they are Most Impudent Lies, meer forgeries, or the most unquestionable Duties made most odious sins; and most of the pretence fetcht from some words of my Writings and Confessions depraved and impudently falsified.
The General Accusation is page 14. [I dare challenge any Historian that hath observed or read the Tragedies of the late times, to show a parallel in any one person (I say not only among the Apostate Clergy, but the Laity, and the worst of them) that may equal Mr. B.
The General Accusation is page 14. [I dare challenge any Historian that hath observed or read the Tragedies of the late times, to shew a parallel in any one person (I say not only among the Apostate Clergy, but the Laity, and the worst of them) that may equal Mr. B.