A26982:321
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
As for the Charge of Schism, I verily think that the Irish may as modestly transfer on the Protestants the charge of Rebellion, as King Charles II. his Prelates can lay on such as I the charge of Schism, which they have so powerfully caused, and continued: He that will read my Search for the Schismatic, needeth no further proof: And he that will not, may keep his beloved Error.
As for the Charge of Schism, I verily think that the Irish may as modestly transfer on the Protestants the charge of Rebellion, as King Charles II. his Prelates can lay on such as I the charge of Schism, which they have so powerfully caused, and continued: He that will read my Search for the Schismatick, needeth no further proof: And he that will not, may keep his beloved Errour.
§ 23. Accus. X. Answered: I said that I was bred up under eight Reading School masters, of whom divers were beggared by drinking.
§ 23. Accus. X. Answered: I said that I was bred up under eight Reading School masters, of whom divers were beggar'd by drinking.
Must I repent of that? Or of disliking such Churchmen? O I should have said nothing ill of the dead! No nor of their living Successors; for ⟨p. 46⟩hence is the rage: O how intolerable to these Men is reproof and repentance in comparison of Sin!