A26982:387
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Arg. 3. They that were really for the Common Safety, and Salus Populi and the very Constituted Form of Government in a case of notorious danger, and only against an Army of Subjects that fled from the Justice of the Supreme Judicature, were righter than those that were against their Wars. But, &c. Ergo, &c.
Arg. 3. They that were really for the Common Safety, and Salus Populi and the very Constituted Form of Government in a case of notorious danger, and only against an Army of Subjects that fled from the Justice of the Supream Judicature, were righter than those that were against their Wars. But, &c. Ergo, &c.
Arg. 4. They that were for a Defensive War according to Law and Constitution, were righter than they that raised War against them contrary to Law and Constitution—But, &c. Ergo, &c.
The Parliament to the last were against all violence to the Person of the King, and were cast out by Cromwell for Voting to receive him.
As it was easy for Bradshaw and •ook to Charge all the Bloodshed on the King, so is it fo[…] […] Accuser to Charge it according to his Judgment. But all of us must be willing of Conviction, and deep Repentance, so far as we shall be proved guilty.