A26982:389
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The Parliament to the last were against all violence to the Person of the King, and were cast out by Cromwell for Voting to receive him.
As it was easy for Bradshaw and •ook to Charge all the Bloodshed on the King, so is it fo[…] […] Accuser to Charge it according to his Judgment. But all of us must be willing of Conviction, and deep Repentance, so far as we shall be proved guilty.
As it was easie for Bradshaw and •ook to Charge all the Bloodshed on the King, so is it fo〈…〉 〈…〉 Accuser to Charge it according to his Judgment. But all of us must be willing of Conviction, and deep Repentance, so far as we shall be proved guilty.
Arg 5. The present King and Parliament have by Practice and by Law declared the right of more than Arming and Resisting a King in several Cases.
Arg. 6. In a doubtful Case under God there is no Judge that hath a deciding power above the Supreme Judicature.