A26982:408
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But say these Accusers, All this was but justice, and was well done. But the casting out of two hundred accused on Oath for gross scandal, and utter insufficiency, by the Parliament, was Persecution and was not well done.
§ 51. Accus. XXXVIII. Next I am accused because other Men exploded the Lords Prayer.
Ans. 1. And what is that to me, that constantly used it? 2. And who may not see that the use of it was prescribed in the Directory? 3. And the Presbyterian (and Episcopal Nonconformists that now are) commonly used it. But he hath found out one Independent Dr. John Owen, who when he was Vice-Chancellor at Oxford was against the common use of it as necessary.
§ 52. Accus. XXXIX. He feigneth also that the Creed and Ten Commandments were also cast out, and scarce a Chapter read in many Churches.