A26982:413
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 53. Accus. XL. His Exclamation against the Scots Covenant and Cromwell's doings, I before showed to be just: And I think I opposed both more than he did.
§ 53. Accus. XL. His Exclamation against the Scots Covenant and Cromwell's doings, I before shewed to be just: And I think I opposed both more than he did.
§ 54. Accus. XLI. Page 39. Whereas I before said how I went into ⟨p. 56⟩the Army after Naseby Fight by the Consent of an Assembly of Loyal Ministers in Coventry, to try whether there was any hope to save the Church and State from the Corrupted Army: He feigneth that this was the Westminster Assembly, or some Rebellious Branch of them: All falsely as the rest.
§ 54. Accus. XLI. Page 39. Whereas I before said how I went into ⟨p. 56⟩the Army after Naseby Fight by the Consent of an Assembly of Loyal Ministers in Coventry, to try whether there was any hope to save the Church and State from the Corrupted Army: He feigneth that this was the Westminster Assembly, or some Rebellious Branch of them: All falsly as the rest.
§ 55. Accus. XLII. That I went to Col. Whalley.] Ans. Who then profest himself a Lamenter of the Armies Corruption, and a Desirer of their Reformation, and so continued while I was with him: But was after overcome by his Kinsman Cromwell and worldly Interest, to hold on with them for his preferment.