A26982:459
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 72. Accus. LV. He saith that I think my self wronged that I had not the fifth part still paid me, and expected to have it offered as my due.]
Ans. A mere Lye: 'Tis capable of no better Name and Answer.
§ 73. Accus. LVI. Because I said that the Papists Doctrine of deposing and destroying Kings was worse, or had less excuse, than their act that here had fought against him,] while I published my abhorrence of both sorts of Regicides, he feigneth me to plead for them, and that more than others.
§ 74. Accus. LVII. Pag. 57. He saith It is Men of my persuasion that say, that the Representatives of the People in Parliament have the supreme Power; and whatever is enacted and declared for Law by the Commons in Parliament, hath the form of a Law.]
§ 74. Accus. LVII. Pag. 57. He saith It is Men of my persuasion that say, that the Representatives of the People in Parliament have the supream Power; and whatever is enacted and declared for Law by the Commons in Parliament, hath the form of a Law.]