A26982:461
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 73. Accus. LVI. Because I said that the Papists Doctrine of deposing and destroying Kings was worse, or had less excuse, than their act that here had fought against him,] while I published my abhorrence of both sorts of Regicides, he feigneth me to plead for them, and that more than others.
§ 74. Accus. LVII. Pag. 57. He saith It is Men of my persuasion that say, that the Representatives of the People in Parliament have the supreme Power; and whatever is enacted and declared for Law by the Commons in Parliament, hath the form of a Law.]
§ 74. Accus. LVII. Pag. 57. He saith It is Men of my persuasion that say, that the Representatives of the People in Parliament have the supream Power; and whatever is enacted and declared for Law by the Commons in Parliament, hath the form of a Law.]
Ans. Impudently false: Whereas in my Christian Directory I have fully confuted this, and such like, in Ri. Hooker, the Man of their persuasion that they boast of. Had he said that I hold that they have part of the Supreme Legislative Power, he had said true.
Ans. Impudently false: Whereas in my Christian Directory I have fully confuted this, and such like, in Ri. Hooker, the Man of their persuasion that they boast of. Had he said that I hold that they have part of the Supream Legislative Power, he had said true.