A26982:479
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 80 Accus. LXIII. Pag. 67. [He hath been made use of as one of the most keen and Catholic Tools, that ever the Papacy did employ.]
§ 80 Accus. LXIII. Pag. 67. [He hath been made use of as one of the most keen and Catholick Tools, that ever the Papacy did employ.]
Ans. 1. 'Tis an unrighteous Honour to Popery to call it Catholic, while they are a Sect contrary to Catholicism. But why then do not these Men love and cherish me, while they are striving for a Foreign Jurisdiction, if I be so much for them?
Ans. 1. 'Tis an unrighteous Honour to Popery to call it Catholick, while they are a Sect contrary to Catholicism. But why then do not these Men love and cherish me, while they are striving for a Foreign Jurisdiction, if I be so much for them?
§ 81. Accus. LXIV. Pag. 68. [That I am for a mixture of Episcopal, Presbyterian and Independent Government.]
Ans. And what harm is that? I am for that which is good in all, and for the Faults of none: But these Men must needs be faultless, and curse all others, that they may bless themselves. But am I Episcopal, and yet the greatest Enemy to Episcopacy? Are they for Episcopacy that put down hundreds, to set up one in their stead?