A26982:501
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 87. Accus. LXX. He saith, I injuriously mention King Charles the First his Answer to the Nineteen Propositions, because he there gave away his Right for Peace.]
Ans. I mention only his own description of the Constitution by King, Lords and Commons, and their several Powers: And would he persuade ⟨p. 73⟩Men that the King falsely described it, or that his Historical Description was his Guilt.
Ans. I mention only his own description of the Constitution by King, Lords and Commons, and their several Powers: And would he persuade ⟨p. 73⟩Men that the King falsly described it, or that his Historical Description was his Guilt.
And he falsely saith, that I am a Dissenter from Bishop Usher's Judgment about the King's Tribute in Ireland. His Uuntruths come so thick, that I am weary of naming them.
And he falsly saith, that I am a Dissenter from Bishop Usher's Judgment about the King's Tribute in Ireland. His Uuntruths come so thick, that I am weary of naming them.