A26982:503
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
And he falsely saith, that I am a Dissenter from Bishop Usher's Judgment about the King's Tribute in Ireland. His Uuntruths come so thick, that I am weary of naming them.
And he falsly saith, that I am a Dissenter from Bishop Usher's Judgment about the King's Tribute in Ireland. His Uuntruths come so thick, that I am weary of naming them.
As, pag. 88. 1. That I was for the Extirpation of Episcopacy, Root and Branch.
2. And yet, that the Archbishop's Model (which we desired) preserveth that Species of Diocesan Bishops, which Mr. B. would destroy. Would we destroy that which we desired?
3. And [That under which Mr. B. maketh Christ's true Discipline unpracticable.] Ans. Palpably false: For, therefore we desired it, because it maketh that Discipline practicable by the help of Parish-Pastors, which without them is impossible.
3. And [That under which Mr. B. maketh Christ's true Discipline unpraecticable.] Ans. Palpably false: For, therefore we desired it, because it maketh that Discipline practicable by the help of Parish-Pastors, which without them is impossible.