A26982:517
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 90. Accus. LXXIII. Page 96. After other Harangues he allegeth false Causes of my refusing a Bishopric: I satisfied the Lord Chancellor Hide by a Letter, with truer Reasons, too long here to repeat.
§ 90. Accus. LXXIII. Page 96. After other Harangues he alledgeth false Causes of my refusing a Bishoprick: I satisfied the Lord Chancellor Hide by a Letter, with truer Reasons, too long here to repeat.
§ 91. Accus. LXXIV. He next accuseth my Moral Prognostication. Ans. Let it answer for it self to the Impartial Reader.
§ 92. Accus. LXXV. He threateneth me for blaming the Laws.
Ans. And do not many Bishops now blame the Laws? If Laws be made engines of Schism and Persecution, let them justify them that can, and that love them. David saith, Shall the Throne of Iniquity have Fellowship with thee that frameth mischief by a Law? How many German Divines blamed the Interim imposed by the Emperor as for Peace?
Ans. And do not many Bishops now blame the Laws? If Laws be made engines of Schism and Persecution, let them justifie them that can, and that love them. David saith, Shall the Throne of Iniquity have Fellowship with thee that frameth mischief by a Law? How many German Divines blamed the Interim imposed by the Emperor as for Peace?