A26982:524
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 95. Accus. LXXVIII. Page 101. [He is not ashamed to be a procurer of the Indulgence for Popery▪ 1. Because I said, [I would have Papists used like Men. 2. I would have no Man put to death for being a Priest. 3. I would have no writ de Excommunicato capiendo, or any Law to compel them to our Communion and Sacraments.]
Ans. This Man is for Moderation: Do you think he or I is more for Popery, or hath written more against it? Would he not have them used like Men? nor suffered to live? And must they be cast out of a Church that they were never in: It seems he would receive them all to his Sacramental Communion, if they will but choose his Church before the Goal.
Ans. This Man is for Moderation: Do you think he or I is more for Popery, or hath written more against it? Would he not have them used like Men? nor suffered to live? And must they be cast out of a Church that they were never in: It seems he would receive them all to his Sacramental Communion, if they will but chuse his Church before the Goal.
§ 96. Accus. LXXIX. Page 102. Because I hold that If a Bishop or their Church Party would lay us in Goal, for our Duty to God, it is lawful to accept deliverance from a Papist that is in Authority.] He feigneth that, If they will not come to us, I would go to them.