A26982:532
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 99. Accus. LXXXII. He accuseth my Plea for Peace, and my Book called, The true and only way of the Churches Concord, as being utterly against Peace. Ans. Read them and Judge.
§ 100. Accus. LXXXIII. He accuseth my History of turbulent Bishops and Councils and their Anathematizing, as if it were false, and almost all was done by Presbyters, Ans. Let him that hath read it, and the proof I cite, freely judge who is the falsifier.
As to his talk about Nestorius, had he read David Derodon and what I have said in my Reply to the Defender of Dr. Stillingfleet (Mr. Morris) it might have acquainted him with more than he seemeth ⟨p. 77⟩to know, about the Nestorians, Eutychians and Monothelites.
As to his talk about Nestorius, had he read David Derodon and what I have said in my Reply to the Defender of Dr. Stillingfleet (Mr. Morrice) it might have acquainted him with more than he seemeth ⟨p. 77⟩to know, about the Nestorians, Eutychians and Monothelites.