A26982:544
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 102. Page 127. He nameth [The Act for Uniformity.] As if naming it were a Defence of it for Silencing 2000 Ministers for not Lying and Sinning.
He nameth [Renouncing the Covenant.] And is that a Justification against Perjury, to them that own not the Imposing or Taking it, nor obligation to keep any but the Moral Necessary parts?
He nameth the [Declaration that it is not lawful on any pretence whatsoever, (to take Arms against any Commissioned by the King.) And is that a Confutation of Bilson, and other Bishops; and doth he not make his own Church and Party now perjured, who have taken Arms against King James, or those that were Commissioned by him; and have set up another King? If King James Commission a French and Irish Army to Invade England, are all bound not to resist them?
§ 103. Accus. LXXXV. He chargeth me with a Scandalum Magnatum, for saying, [The Parliament was drawn by the Clergy to make those Acts.]