A26982:584
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
4. Why were not the Eight Thousand that after conformed, guilty of those Confusions as much as the rest? Yea, many of them had been in Arms against the King's Army.
5. Was Declaring Assent and Consent to all things contained and prescribed in your Books a Means to prevent Wars or Confusions, when such ⟨p. 84⟩Impositions caused them? Is silencing, ruining, and keeping in Goals all that own not so much of your Infallibility, the Means to avoid Confusions?
6. What were the present Endeavours to reduce you to the like? Was it the Presbyterians bringing home the King, who they doubted not would set up the revengeful Clergy? Why were they not accused for false or seditious Doctrine, if they were guilty, or forbidden only to preach such, but forbidden to preach at all, and accused merely for preaching?
6. What were the present Endeavours to reduce you to the like? Was it the Presbyterians bringing home the King, who they doubted not would set up the revengeful Clergy? Why were they not accused for false or seditious Doctrine, if they were guilty, or forbidden only to preach such, but forbidden to preach at all, and accused meerly for preaching?