A26982:586
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called…
Richard Baxter's penitent confession and his necessary vindication in answer to a book called The second part of the mischiefs of separation, written by an unnamed author with a preface to Mr. Cantianus D. Minimis, in answer to his letter which extorted this publication.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
6. What were the present Endeavours to reduce you to the like? Was it the Presbyterians bringing home the King, who they doubted not would set up the revengeful Clergy? Why were they not accused for false or seditious Doctrine, if they were guilty, or forbidden only to preach such, but forbidden to preach at all, and accused merely for preaching?
6. What were the present Endeavours to reduce you to the like? Was it the Presbyterians bringing home the King, who they doubted not would set up the revengeful Clergy? Why were they not accused for false or seditious Doctrine, if they were guilty, or forbidden only to preach such, but forbidden to preach at all, and accused meerly for preaching?
His long Invective, to pag. 148. is partly a false Report of my Words, and partly a Justification of all their Persecutions, and an Outcry against a Persuasive to Repentance. Let the Reader but peruse the Books accused, and I desire him but to judge as he seeth cause.
§ 115. Accus. XCVII. If the Reader will himself read my Treatise of Episcopacy, which he accuseth, I will make no other Defence of it than what it maketh for it self. But his Words convince me not, that Reproving Persecutors is worse than Persecuting.