*Answ. You may as well argue, that Aristotle was no wiser than a Minstrel, because he could not fiddle so well, nor than a Painter, because he could not limn so well; or than a harlot, because he could not dress himself so neatly. Means are to be estimated according to their fitness for their ends. Christ himself excelled all mankind, in all true perfections; and yet it became him not to exercise all mens arts, to show that he excelleth them. He came not into the world to teach men Architecture, Navigation, Medicine, Astronomy, Grammar, Music, Logic, Rhetoric, &c. and therefore showed not his skill in these. The world had sufficient helps and means for these in Nature. It was to save men from ⟨p. 410⟩[…] ⟨p. 411⟩[…] ⟨p. 410⟩sin and hell, 2and bring them to pardon, holiness and heaven, that Christ was incarnate, and that the Apostles were inspired, and the Scriptures written: and to be fitted to these ends, is the excellency to be expected in them: and in this they excel all persons and writings in the world. As God doth not syllogize or know by our imperfect way of ratiocination, but yet knoweth all things better than syllogizers do; so Christ hath a more high and excellent kind of Logic and Oratory, and a more apt and spiritual and powerful style, than Aristotle, Demosthenes, Cicero or Seneca. He showed not that skill in methodical healing which Hippocrates and Galen showed: But he showed more and better skill, when he could heal with a word, and raise the dead, and had the power of life and death, so did he bring more convincing evidence than Aristotle, and persuaded more powerfully than Demosthenes or Cicero. And though this kind of formal learning was below him, and below the inspired messengers of his Gospel, yet his inferior servants (an Aquinas, a Scotus, an Ockam, a Scaliger, a Ramus, a Gassendus) do match or excel the old Philosophers, and abundance of Christians equalize or excel a Demosthenes or Cicero, in the truest Oratory.
*Answ. You may as well argue, that Aristotle was no wiser than a Minstrel, because he could not fiddle so well, nor than a Painter, because he could not limn so well; or than a harlot, because he could not dress himself so neatly. Means are to be estimated according to their fitness for their ends. Christ himself excelled all mankind, in all true perfections; and yet it became him not to exercise all mens arts, to shew that he excelleth them. He came not into the world to teach men Architecture, Navigation, Medicine, Astronomy, Grammar, Musick, Logick, Rhetorick, &c. and therefore shewed not his skill in these. The world had sufficient helps and means for these in Nature. It was to save men from ⟨p. 410⟩〈…〉 ⟨p. 411⟩〈…〉 ⟨p. 410⟩sin and hell, 2and bring them to pardon, holiness and heaven, that Christ was incarnate, and that the Apostles were inspired, and the Scriptures written: and to be fitted to these ends, is the excellency to be expected in them: and in this they excell all persons and writings in the world. As God doth not syllogize or know by our imperfect way of ratiocination, but yet knoweth all things better than syllogizers do; so Christ hath a more high and excellent kind of Logick and Oratory, and a more apt and spiritual and powerful style, than Aristotle, Demosthenes, Cicero or Seneca. He shewed not that skill in methodical healing which Hippocrates and Galen shewed: But he shewed more and better skill, when he could heal with a word, and raise the dead, and had the power of life and death, so did he bring more convincing evidence than Aristotle, and perswaded more powerfully than Demosthenes or Cicero. And though this kind of formal learning was below him, and below the inspired messengers of his Gospel, yet his inferiour servants (an Aquinas, a Scotus, an Ockam, a Scaliger, a Ramus, a Gassendus) do match or excel the old Philosophers, and abundance of Christians equalize or excel a Demosthenes or Cicero, in the truest Oratory.
- *The parts and style of men may vary, who speak the same truth. Sentit ut Py•hagoras, dividit ut Socrates, explicat ut Plato, implicat ut Aristoteles, ut Aeschines blanditur, ut Demosthenes irascitur, vernat ut Hortensius, ut Cethegus, incitat ut Curio, moratur ut Fabius, simulat ut Crassus, dissimulat ut Caesar, suadet ut Cato, dissuadet ut Appius, persuadet ut Tullius: instruit ut Hieronimus, destruit ut Lactantius, astruit ut Augustinus, attollitur ut Hilarius, summittitur ut Joannes, ut Basilius corripit, ut Gregorius consolatur, ut Orosius affluit, ut Ruffinus stringitur, ut Eusebius narrat; ut Eucheus sollicitat, ut Paulinus provocat, ut Ambrosius perseverat. Sidonius Ep Mamme•t. pop. l. de Even as your Heathen Authors had their several styles, so had the Sacred Writers. Qua Cris•us brevitate pla•er, quo pondere Varro. Quo genio Plautus, quo flumine Quintilianus. Qua pompa Tacitus nunquam sine laud loquendus. Apol. Sidonius Carm 2. Auctuar. Bib. Patr. p. 123.The parts and style of men may vary, who speak the same truth. Sentit ut Py•hagoras, dividit ut Socrates, explicat ut Plato, implicat ut Aristoteles, ut Aeschines blanditur, ut Demosthenes irascitur, vernat ut Hortensius, ut Cethegus, incitat ut Curio, moratur ut Fabius, simulat ut Crassus, dissimulat ut Caesar, suadet ut Cato, dissuadet ut Appius, persuadet ut Tullius: instruit ut Hieronimus, destruit ut Lactantius, astruit ut Augustinus, attollitur ut Hilarius, summittitur ut Joannes, ut Basilius corripit, ut Gregorius consolatur, ut Orosius affluit, ut Ruffinus stringitur, ut Eusebius narrat; ut Eucheus sollicitat, ut Paulinus provocat, ut Ambrosius perseverat. Sidonius Ep Mamme•t. pop. l. de Even as your Heathen Authors had their several styles, so had the Sacred Writers. Qua Cris•us brevitate pla•er, quo pondere Varro. Quo genio Plautus, quo flumine Quintilianus. Qua pompa Tacitus nunquam sine laude loquendus. Apol. Sidonius Carm 2. Auctuar. Bib. Patr. p. 123.
- 2Nihil fide nostra ini quius fingi posset, si in eruditos tantum, & dicendi facultate & Logicis demonstrationibus excellentes caderet: popularis autem multitudo, ut auro & argento aliisque omnibus rebus, quae hic in pretio habentur, atque à plerisque avid expetuntur, sic hoc quoque frustraretur, ac Deus id quod altum & excelsum est, & ad paucos pertingit, gratum acceptumque haberet; contra, quod propinquius est, nec vulgi captum superat, aspernaretur & rejiceret. Nazianz. Orat. 26. p. 458. Sed ab indoctis hominibus & rudibus scripta sunt. Et idcirco non sunt facili auditione credenda. Vide ne magis fortior haec causa fit: cur illa sint nullis coinqunata mendaciis; meant simplici prodita, & ignara lenociniis ampliare Trivialis & sordidus sermo est: Nunquam enim veritas sectata est fucum, nec quod exploratum & certum est, circumduci se patitur orationis per ambitum longiorem: Collections Enthymemeta, definitiones, omniaque illa ornamenta quibus fides quaeritur assertionis, suspicantes adjuvant, non veritatis lineamenta demonstrant— Soloecismis, Barbarismis, inquis obsitae sunt tes vestrae— Puerilis sane & angusti pectoris reprehensio: Quam si admitteremus ut vera sit— Quid enim officit, O quaeso? aut quam praestat intellectui tarditatem? utiumne quid leve, an hirsuta cum asperitate promatur? inflectatur quod acui, an acuatur quod oportebat inflecti— Arnob. l. 1. p. 10. Dissoluti est pectoris, in rebus seriis quaerere voluptatem— Atsi verum spectes, nullus sermo natura est integer, vitiosus similiter nullus: Quaenam enim est ratio naturalis, aut in mundi constitutionibus lex scripta, ut hic paries dicatur, & haec sella? Id. ibid.