A27004:451
The reasons of the Christian religion the first part, of godliness, proving by natural…
The reasons of the Christian religion the first part, of godliness, proving by natural evidence the being of God ... : the second part, of Christianity, proving by evidence supernatural and natural, the certain truth of the Christian belief ... / by Richard Baxter ... ; also an appendix defending the soul's immortality against the Somatists or Epicureans and other pseudo-philosophers.
London: printed by R. White for Fran. Titon, 1667
Part 1 › Chapter 10: Of GOD's particular Laws as known in Nature.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
That the inward axioms as known are not Laws, is evident, 1. Because a Law is in genere objectivo, and this is in genere actionum: A Law is in genere signorum; but this is the discerning of the sign: A Law is the will of the Rector signified: this is his will known: A Law is Obligatory: this is the perception of an Obligation. A Law maketh duty: but this is the knowledge of a duty made. 2. The Law is not in our power to change or abrogate: But a mans inward dispositions and perceptions are much in his power, to increase or diminish, or obliterate: Every man that is wilfully sensual and wicked, may do much to blot out the Law of Nature, which is said to be written on his heart; But wickedness cannot alter or obliterare the Law of God: If this were Gods Law which is upon the heart, when a sinner hath blotted it out, he is disobliged from duty and punishment: For where there is no Law, there is no duty or transgression. But no sinner can so disoblige himself by altering his Makers Laws: 3. Else there would be as many Laws of Nature, not only as there are men, but as there are diversity of perceptions: But Gods Law is not so uncertain and multiform a thing. 4. And if Mans disposition or actual knowledge be Gods Law, it may be also called Mans Law: And so the Kings Law, should be the Subjects perception of it.
That the inward axiomes as known are not Laws, is evident, 1. Because a Law is in genere objectivo, and this is in genere actionum: A Law is in genere signorum; but this is the discerning of the sign: A Law is the will of the Rector signified: this is his will known: A Law is Obligatory: this is the perception of an Obligation. A Law maketh duty: but this is the knowledge of a duty made. 2. The Law is not in our power to change or abrogate: But a mans inward dispositions and perceptions are much in his power, to encrease or diminish, or obliterate: Every man that is wilfully sensual and wicked, may do much to blot out the Law of Nature, which is said to be written on his heart; But wickedness cannot alter or obliterare the Law of God: If this were Gods Law which is upon the heart, when a sinner hath blotted it out, he is disobliged from duty and punishment: For where there is no Law, there is no duty or transgression. But no sinner can so disoblige himself by altering his Makers Laws: 3. Else there would be as many Laws of Nature, not only as there are men, but as there are diversity of perceptions: But Gods Law is not so uncertain and multiform a thing. 4. And if Mans disposition or actual knowledge be Gods Law, it may be also called Mans Law: And so the Kings Law, should be the Subjects perception of it.