A27007:65
A reply to Mr. Tho. Beverley's answer to my reasons against his doctrine of…
A reply to Mr. Tho. Beverley's answer to my reasons against his doctrine of the thousand years middle kingdom, and of the conversion of the Jews by Richard Baxter.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1691
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Arg. I. King of Kings is a Title fit for a great Kingdom, &c. What then? Ergo it proveth a Middle Kingdom between that of Recovering Grace, and Resurrection Glory.) I deny the consequence; no Kingdom is fitter for those Titles than that of Grace and final Glory. This is not proving.
It's false that Christ hath not yet been an Universal Monarch.
Pag. 15. Your 2d Argument (as the rest) is but a repeating of your own formally confuted Opinions, without any reply to the Confutation, as if you had nothing to do, but assert again what you think.
1 Cor. 15. 24. Is your proof, Then cometh the end? And is the Thousand years the end, and not the Glorious Kingdom of fruition? Judgment will end by Triumph the Kingdom of Acquisition: But the eternal Kingdom will be the last.