A27011:209
Roman tradition examined, as it is urged as infallible against all mens senses, reason,…
Roman tradition examined, as it is urged as infallible against all mens senses, reason, the Holy Scripture, the tradition and present judgment of the far greatest part of the Universal Church; in the point of transubstantiation; in answer to a book called A rational discourse of transubstantiation.Roman tradition examined, as it is urged as infallible against all mens senses, reason, the Holy Scripture, the tradition and present judgment of the far greatst part of the Universal Church; in the point of transubstantiation; in answer to a book called A rational discourse of transubstantiation.
S.l. : s.n., 1676
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
POSTSCRIPT.
Since the Writing of this I first saw Larrogue's French Discourse, and therein the Citation of Joh. Parisiensis Opinion about Transubstantiation, and the Sorbonists determination, that neither Opinion was de fide, and determined: And did they not then know Tradition?
SInce the Writing of this I first saw Larrogues French Discourse, and therein the Citation of Joh. Parisiensis Opinion about Transubstantiation, and the Sorbonists determination, that neither Opinion was de fide, and determined: And did they not then know Tradition?
Since that I have seen Bishop Cousin's History of Transubstantiation, which so fully proveth the Novelty of it, as against the Tradition and Judgment of the Church, and that by Fathers and many Councils, in all Ages till Innoc. 3. and even after Petrus Blesensis, and Steph. Aedunensis (who first name it) and Innoc. 3. who first established it, few believed it in most Countries, as their own Authors confess; that I repented that I had needlessly ⟨p. 73⟩meddled with the Citation of Authors, which is done by him so much better: And indeed such unanswerable Testimony is produced by him, (and that briefly in a small Volume) to prove that the constant Judgment of the Church hath been against Transubstantiation, that I need not refer the doubting Reader to any other Book, nor provoke the Papists to try their strength upon any other: (Though Hospinian, Usher, Chamier, Spalatensis, Albertinus, and abundance more, have done it beyond all reasonable contradiction.)
Since that I have seen Bishop Cousin's History of Transubstantiation, which so fully proveth the Novelty of it, as against the Tradition and Judgment of the Church, and that by Fathers and many Councils, in all Ages till Innoc. 3. and even after Petrus Blesensis, and Steph. Aedunensis (who first name it) and Innoc. 3. who first established it, few believed it in most Countries, as their own Authors confess; that I repented that I had needlesly