A27015:193
The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholic religion against popery proving…The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholike religion against popery proving…
The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholic religion against popery proving that popery is against the Holy Scriptures, the unity of the catholic church, the consent of the ancient doctors, the plainest reason, and common judgment of sense it self / by Richard Baxter.The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholike religion against popery proving that popery is against the Holy Scriptures, the unity of the catholike church, the consent of the antient doctors, the plainest reason, and common judgment of sense it self / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed by Abraham Miller for Thomas Underhill, 1657
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But he instanceth in our differences: And 1. he saith [The Grecians hold one supreme head of the whole Church under Christ] Repl. An immodest fiction to uphold a cause that's like it.
But he instanceth in our differences: And 1. he saith [The Grecians hold one supreme head of the whole Church under Christ] Repl. An immodest fiction to uphold a cause thats like it.
2. He saith [The Grecians hold the Real presence of our Saviours body and blood in the Eucharist] Repl. not Transubstantiation; which they deny: The But Protestants do hold some kind of Real presence.
2. He saith [The Grecians hold the Real presence of our Saviours body and blood in the Eucharist] Repl. not Transubstantiation; which they deny: The But Protestants do hold some kind of Reall presence.
3. He saith [The Grecians defend the necessity of Baptism to salvation, and that Original sin is remitted thereby] Repl. And the Protestants hold it necessary necessitate praecepti, and as an ordinary means where it can be had: And neither the Greeks nor all your own dare damn all Infants that dye before Baptism, when it could not be had; but you say that the Votum may serve turn. And also Protestants hold that if the Infants be within the Covenant, as it pardoneth their Original sin primarily, so Baptism pardoneth it by way of obsignation and solemn conveyance: But what is all this to your error that Original sin is not only remitted, but quite extinct or done away out of our natures by Baptism; so that the new baptized Infant, is perfectly without any Radical sin, as well as without the Guilt of it?
3. He saith [The Grecians defend the necessity of Baptisme to salvation, and that Original sin is remitted thereby] Repl. And the Protestants hold it necessary necessitate praecepti, and as an ordinary means where it can be had: And neither the Greeks nor all your own dare damne all Infants that dye before Baptisme, when it could not be had; but you say that the Votum may serve turne. And also Protestants hold that if the Infants be within the Covenant, as it pardoneth their Original sin primarily, so Baptisme pardoneth it by way of obsignation and solemne conveyance: But what is all this to your error that Original sin is not onely remitted, but quite extinct or done away out of our natures by Baptisme; so that the new baptized Infant, is perfectly without any Radical sin, as well as without the Guilt of it?