A27015:325
The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholic religion against popery proving…The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholike religion against popery proving…
The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholic religion against popery proving that popery is against the Holy Scriptures, the unity of the catholic church, the consent of the ancient doctors, the plainest reason, and common judgment of sense it self / by Richard Baxter.The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholike religion against popery proving that popery is against the Holy Scriptures, the unity of the catholike church, the consent of the antient doctors, the plainest reason, and common judgment of sense it self / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed by Abraham Miller for Thomas Underhill, 1657
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Yet note that the profit of indulgences is expressly sworn to in the new Trent Creed as part of their Belief.
This passage of Fishers was alleged by Bishop Usher in his Answer to the Jesuits challenge, and the like from Cajetans confessing that the beginning of indulgences is not known: What the adversaries can say against these citations, you may see confuted by Mr. Sing in his Rejoinder in Defence of Bishop Usher against the Jesuit, pag. 81.82, 83.
This passage of Fishers was alledged by Bishop Ʋsher in his Answer to the Jesuites challenge, and the like from Cajetans confessing that the beginning of indulgences is not known: What the adversaries can say against these citations, you may see confuted by Mr. Sing in his Rejoynder in Defence of Bishop Ʋsher against the Jesuite, pag. 81.82, 83.
That the use of the Sacrament in one kind is a new invention, is commonly confessed by them. See Albaspinaeus a sober Bishop of theirs in his observations, after his notes on Optatus, cap. 4. de Communione Laica, pag. 10.11. showing the novelty of the now Romish Communion. And Gregor. de Valentia the Jesuit confesseth that minime constat, it is not known when the custom of receiving the Sacrament in one kind only began, but that it was not by any Decree of a Bishop, but crept in by some custom of the people. Of which also see Bishop Usher ibid. and his Defender Mr. Sing p 78.82, 83.
That the use of the Sacrament in one kind is a new invention, is commonly confessed by them. See Albaspinaeus a sober Bishop of theirs in his observations, after his notes on Optatus, cap. 4. de Communione Laica, pag. 10.11. shewing the novelty of the now Romish Communion. And Gregor. de Valentia the Jesuite confesseth that minime constat, it is not known when the custome of receiving the Sacrament in one kind onely began, but that it was not by any Decree of a Bishop, but crept in by some custome of the people. Of which also see Bishop Ʋsher ibid. and his Defender Mr. Sing p 78.82, 83.