A27015:403
The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholic religion against popery proving…The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholike religion against popery proving…
The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholic religion against popery proving that popery is against the Holy Scriptures, the unity of the catholic church, the consent of the ancient doctors, the plainest reason, and common judgment of sense it self / by Richard Baxter.The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholike religion against popery proving that popery is against the Holy Scriptures, the unity of the catholike church, the consent of the antient doctors, the plainest reason, and common judgment of sense it self / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed by Abraham Miller for Thomas Underhill, 1657
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. If the Bread were Christs real Body, then Christ had two real bodies: for he had one sitting at the table, which delivered the Bread, and if the Bread were another, he had two: or else the body that Christ sate and lived with, was not a whole body, but a part: But Christ had but one body, and that was entire.
2. It would follow also that Christ had a living and a dead body, a sensible and insensible body both at once.
3. It would follow that the Apostles did tear Christ true flesh, and draw out his blood as well as the Jews did.
4. Yea and that they began to the Jews, and did it before them: And therefore why should the Jews act, and theirs be so much differenced?