A27015:688
The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholic religion against popery proving…The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholike religion against popery proving…
The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholic religion against popery proving that popery is against the Holy Scriptures, the unity of the catholic church, the consent of the ancient doctors, the plainest reason, and common judgment of sense it self / by Richard Baxter.The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholike religion against popery proving that popery is against the Holy Scriptures, the unity of the catholike church, the consent of the antient doctors, the plainest reason, and common judgment of sense it self / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed by Abraham Miller for Thomas Underhill, 1657
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Q 3. Is there any man breathing that can bring sufficient Arguments to prove. 1. That there is a Church of Christ. 2. And that this Church is infallible. 3. And that the Pope and Papists are this Church, before their hearers have received or believed the word of God? If they can, why have they not fallen closer to work in this necessary point, when they know how much it would do to the determination of the whole? If they pretend such Antecedent proof by miracles, as the Apostles proved the Doctrine by, I have showed the vanity of this pretence (against Knot) before: and we must still desire them, if it be miracles that is their first witness, to let us see, or have certain proof of those Miracles. We protest to all the world that we are heartily ⟨p. 282⟩willing to see them and know of them if they be true, but though we have lived in the midst of Papists all our lives, yet could we never to this day see any such matter from them, nor hear so much as of any probable proofs of any. And would they have us in a matter of salvation to believe every prating boaster that will tell us of Miracles and show us no such thing, nor any proof of them?
Q 3. Is there any man breathing that can bring sufficient Arguments to prove. 1. That there is a Church of Christ. 2. And that this Church is infallible. 3. And that the Pope and Papists are this Church, before their hearers have received or believed the word of God? If they can, why have they not faln closer to work in this necessary point, when they know how much it would do to the determination of the whole? If they pretend such Antecedent proof by miracles, as the Apostles proved the Doctrine by, I have shewed the vanity of this pretence (against Knot) before: and we must still desire them, if it be miracles that is their first witness, to let us see, or have certaine proofe of those Miracles. We protest to all the world that we are heartily ⟨p. 282⟩willing to see them and know of them if they be true, but though we have lived in the midst of Papists all our lives, yet could we never to this day see any such matter from them, nor hear so much as of any probable proofs of any. And would they have us in a matter of salvation to believe every pr•ting boaster that will tell us of Miracles and shew us no such thing, nor any proof of them?