A27015:88
The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholic religion against popery proving…The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholike religion against popery proving…
The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholic religion against popery proving that popery is against the Holy Scriptures, the unity of the catholic church, the consent of the ancient doctors, the plainest reason, and common judgment of sense it self / by Richard Baxter.The safe religion, or, Three disputations for the reformed catholike religion against popery proving that popery is against the Holy Scriptures, the unity of the catholike church, the consent of the antient doctors, the plainest reason, and common judgment of sense it self / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed by Abraham Miller for Thomas Underhill, 1657
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But yet when I say I am a Reformed Catholic, I purposely disclaim the Corruptions of Popery, and in that word renounce their Errors as such, as by the word Catholic I renounced their Schism: And so I may agree with Luther, Calvin or any man in Reformation, so far as they hold to the word of God: so that if malicious adversaries will put the name of ⟨p. 10⟩Sect upon the Catholic verity, and call it by the name of Zwinglianism, Lutheranism, Calvinis•• or the like, pretending that it had its spring from these men, they shall not by such unworthy means, remove me from the Catholic Religion, nor yet cause me to own their Corruptions, because they have named the opposition of them as a Heresy Augustine would not turn Donatist, because they named the Catholics Caecilians; nor would Prosper turn Pelagian, because they called the Orthodox, Predestinarians or Fatalists, nor would Athanasius before them turn Arian because they called the Orthodox Tritheists. It is not other mens fastening upon us the name of a man, or of a Sect that proves us Sectaries, or that we had our Religion originally from that man. Yet do we so much reverence their names, that we rejoice in their labours for the Church, and bless God for them, and endeavour to imitate them in their holy doctrine and lives, though we make none but Christ the Lord of our Faith
But yet when I say I am a Reformed Catholike, I purposly disclaim the Corruptions of Popery, and in that word renounce their Errors as such, as by the word Catholike I renounced their Schisme: And so I may agree with Luther, Calvin or any man in Reformation, so far as they hold to the word of God: so that if malicious adversaries will put the name of ⟨p. 10⟩Sect upon the Catholike verity, and call it by the name of Zuinglianisme, Lutheranisme, Calvinis•• or the like, pretending that it had its spring from these men, they shall not by such unworthy means, remove me from the Catholike Religion, nor yet cause me to own their Corruptions, because they have named the opposition of them as a Heresie Augustine would not turn Donatist, because they named the Catholikes Caecilians; nor would Prosper turn Pelagian, because they called the Orthodoxe, Predestinarians or Fatalists, nor would Athanasius before them turn Arrian because they called the Orthodoxe Tritheists. It is not other mens fastening upon us the name of a man, or of a Sect that proves us Sectaries, or that we had our Religion originally from that man. Yet do we so much reverence their names, that we rejoyce in their labors for the Church, and bless God for them, and endeavor to imitate them in their holy doctrine and lives, though we make none but Christ the Lord of our Faith