A27028:258
Schism detected in both extremes, or, Two sorts of sinful separation the first part…Schism detected in both extreams, or, Two sorts of sinful separation the first part…
Schism detected in both extremes, or, Two sorts of sinful separation the first part detecteth the schismatical principles of a resolver of three cases about church-communion, the second part confuteth the separation pleaded for in a book famed to be written by Mr. Raphson.Schism detected in both extreams, or, Two sorts of sinful separation the first part detecteth the schismatical principles of a resolver of three cases about church-communion, the second part confuteth the separation pleaded for in a book famed to be written by Mr. Raphson.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
LXXXIII. 33. If a Foreigner that doth but half understand our language, withdraw to a Church and Pastor whose tongue he understands, obeying God and Nature is no damning Schism.
LXXXIV. 34. If one that is erroneously conceited of the obligation of General Councils, should think it a sin to kneel at the Sacrament on any Lords day in the year, or any Week day between Easter and Whitsuntide, because Tradition and the twentieth Canon of the first Council, and that at Trull, &c. do forbid then to adore kneeling, this separating on that account to another Congregation is not damning.
If it be said, that Mr. Thorndike and others tell us that it is not necessary that we do the same things which the Supreme Catholic Power commanded, but that we subject our selves to the same Power which may change their own Laws. I answer, 1. The asserting of that Universal Sovereignty is the greatest Crime and Heresy of all. 2. By this it seems that our Religion is very mutable, and very uncertain, and a man hath need to take heed of obeying any old ⟨p. 41⟩Canons, till he know the mind of the present Church; (and who those be, and how to know it.) 3. But what if the same man read Dr. Heylin (of Sab.) telling him that this custom against Adoration-kneeling continued a thousand years, and was never revoked by any true General Council, but changed by little and little by mens practice: And what if he question who those Changers were, and whether their practice was Rebellion at first, and whether they had power to repeal the Canons of the greatest Councils without a Council. Sure they that are for such Councils universal sovereignty, when they have cast men into these shares, should scarce tell them that they are damnable Schismatics, for joining with such Churches as obey these Councils, rather than with those that mine men for not disobeying them.