The Scripture Gospel defended, and Christ, grace, and free justification vindicated against the libertines…

Sect. 4. 3. Should I cite all the Texts that prove us to need, and have an Inherent and Acted Righteousness by Grace, besides Christs Personal Righteousness Meriting for us, above six hundred Texts of Scripture expressly prove it; and how tedious and needless a work is this?

Sect. 4. 3. Should I cite all the Texts that prove us to need, and have an Inherent and Acted Righteousness by Grace, besides Christs Personal Righteousness Meriting for us, above six hundred Texts of Scripture expresly prove it; and how tedious and needless a work is this?

Sect. 5. 4. Should I prove that All Righteousness, so far maketh Righteous; and that making Righteous, is a Justifying, which goeth before Judging us Righteous; and that it is a putid contradiction, ⟨p. 60⟩to say, that any Righteousness doth not make Righteous, in tantum, School-boys would turn it into a derision of the opposers.

Sect. 6. 5. Should I prove by Argument, that no Accident can by the same numerically in divers Subjects, nor tra•si•• a Subjecto in Su•jectum; and so the Habit, Act, and Relation of Righteousness in Christ's Person, cannot •n it self be our Habit, Act, or Relation, unless our Persons, and Christ's, be really the same; every novice in Logic, would be too much occasioned to insult over the ignorant gain-sayer.

Sect. 6. 5. Should I prove by Argument, that no Accident can by ye same numerically in divers Subjects, nor trasi a Subjecto in Sujectum; and so the Habit, Act, and Relation of Righteousness in Christ's Person, cannot n it self be our Habit, Act, or Relation, unless our Persons, and Christ's, be really the same; every novice in Logick, would be too much occasioned to insult over the ignorant gain-sayer.