A27032:137
A second admonition to Mr. Edward Bagshaw written to call him to repentance for…
A second admonition to Mr. Edward Bagshaw written to call him to repentance for many false doctrines, crimes, and specially fourscore palpable untruths in matter of fact ... : with a confutation of his reasons for separation ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for Nevill Simmons, 1671
A second Admonition to Mr. Edward Bagshaw written in some hope of c… › Section 22
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
R. B. 1. You misprint [the temporal] for [that temporal,] and so turn the predicate into the subject. 2. For [as merely neutral as in almost any point of so great moment, &c.] you put [perfectly neutral.] 3. For [I scarce can perceive which way, &c.] you put [you did not know.] Yet I number not these with your falsehoods, but show you, that you are so habituated to Rashness, that you seldom seem to heed what you report.
R. B. 1. You misprint [the temporal] for [that temporal,] and so turn the predicate into the subject. 2. For [as meerly neutral as in almost any point of so great moment, &c.] you put [perfectly neutral.] 3. For [I scarce can perceive which way, &c.] you put [you did not know.] Yet I number not these with your falshoods, but shew you, that you are so habituated to Rashness, that you seldom seem to heed what you report.
2. And can you wink so hard,1 as not to see how here you openly declare your falsehood? ⟨p. 59⟩Do you prove me as earnest and open an sorter as any, by citing words in which I profess to be ignorant, neutral and uncertain? Will your followers still believe such an open self-contradicting false accuser? Is Neutrality and Uncertainty the most earnest and open asserting of a doctrine? If you say that you meant it of Theocracy; I answer, review your words; you speak of Christs Temporal Reign, and of the Fifth Monarchy way, and say [as earnest and open as any.] Was Mr. Mead, and Dr. Twice but Neutral? Was Mr. Archer but Neutral?
2. And can you wink so hard,1 as not to see how here you openly declare your falsehood? ⟨p. 59⟩Do you prove me as earnest and open an •ssrter as any, by citing words in which I profess to be ignorant, neutral and uncertain? Will your followers still believe such an open self-contradicting false accuser? Is Neutrality and Vncertainty the most earnest and open asserting of a doctrine? If you say that you meant it of Theocracy; I answer, review your words; you speak of Christs Temporal Reign, and of the Fifth Monarchy way, and say [as earnest and open as any.] Was Mr. Mead, and Dr. Twisse but Neutral? Was Mr. Archer but Neutral?