A27035:1016
A second true defence of the mere nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and…A second true defence of the meer nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and…
A second true defence of the mere nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and history of Dr. Edward Stillingfleet ... clearly proving that it is (not sin but) duty 1. not wilfully to commit the many sins of conformity, 2. not sacrilegiously to forsake the preaching of the Gospel, 3. not to cease public worshipping of God, 4. to use needful pastoral helps for salvation ... / written by Richard Baxter ... ; with some notes on Mr. Joseph Glanviles Zealous and impartial Protestant, and Dr. L. Moulins character.A second true defence of the meer nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and history of Dr. Edward Stillingfleet ... clearly proving that it is (not sin but) duty 1. not wilfully to commit the many sins of conformity, 2. not sacrilegiously to forsake the preaching of the Gospel, 3. not to cease publick worshipping of God, 4. to use needful pastoral helps for salvation ... / written by Richard Baxter ... ; with some notes on Mr. Joseph Glanviles Zealous and impartial Protestant, and Dr. L. Moulins character.
London: printed for Nevil Simons, 1681
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3. If it deserve such a Character to censure Arminians as dangerously erroneous and befriending Popery? whether you do not consequently so stigmatize the old Church of England, before Bishop Laud's time? Even Arch-bishop Whitgift, Bishop Fletcher, and the rest who drew up the Lambeth Articles, Arch-bishop Abbot and the Church in his time (except six Bishops, &c.) King James, and the whole Church as consenting by six Delegates to the Synod of Dort: And also that Synod and all the Foreign Reformed Churches that consented to it? And is not this more than Dr. Moulin did?
3. If it deserve such a Character to censure Arminians as dangerously erroneous and befriending Popery? whether you do not consequently so stigmatize the old Church of England, before Bishop Laud's time? Even Arch-bishop Whitgift, Bishop Fletcher, and the rest who drew up the Lambeth Articles, Arch-bishop Abbot and the Church in his time (except six Bishops, &c.) King James, and the whole Church as consenting by six Delegates to the Synod of Dort: And also that Synod and all the Forein Reformed Churches that consented to it? And is not this more than Dr. Moulin did?
4. And are they not then to be accordingly stigmatized, who on the other side make the Calvinists as odious, accusing them of Blasphemy, ⟨p. 186⟩Turkism, and doing as much against them as Dr. Heylin in the Life of Arch-bishop Laud tells us was done in England on that account.
4. And are they not then to be accordingly stigmatized, who on the other side make the Calvinists as odious, accusing them of Blasphemy, ⟨p. 186⟩Turcisme, and doing as much against them as Dr. Heylin in the Life of Arch-bishop Laud tells us was done in England on that account.