A27035:1017
A second true defence of the mere nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and…A second true defence of the meer nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and…
A second true defence of the mere nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and history of Dr. Edward Stillingfleet ... clearly proving that it is (not sin but) duty 1. not wilfully to commit the many sins of conformity, 2. not sacrilegiously to forsake the preaching of the Gospel, 3. not to cease public worshipping of God, 4. to use needful pastoral helps for salvation ... / written by Richard Baxter ... ; with some notes on Mr. Joseph Glanviles Zealous and impartial Protestant, and Dr. L. Moulins character.A second true defence of the meer nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and history of Dr. Edward Stillingfleet ... clearly proving that it is (not sin but) duty 1. not wilfully to commit the many sins of conformity, 2. not sacrilegiously to forsake the preaching of the Gospel, 3. not to cease publick worshipping of God, 4. to use needful pastoral helps for salvation ... / written by Richard Baxter ... ; with some notes on Mr. Joseph Glanviles Zealous and impartial Protestant, and Dr. L. Moulins character.
London: printed for Nevil Simons, 1681
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
4. And are they not then to be accordingly stigmatized, who on the other side make the Calvinists as odious, accusing them of Blasphemy, ⟨p. 186⟩Turkism, and doing as much against them as Dr. Heylin in the Life of Arch-bishop Laud tells us was done in England on that account.
4. And are they not then to be accordingly stigmatized, who on the other side make the Calvinists as odious, accusing them of Blasphemy, ⟨p. 186⟩Turcisme, and doing as much against them as Dr. Heylin in the Life of Arch-bishop Laud tells us was done in England on that account.
5. And if such hard thoughts of Arminians as furthering Popery deserve your Character, whether by consequence you so brand not all those Parliaments who voted against it accordingly, and made it one of the dangerous grievances of the Land? And is not that as faulty as for Dr. Moulin too much to blame you?
6. Yea I doubt you stigmatize thus so great a part of Christians in all the World as I am loth to mention: so rare is it to hear of any Country, where they are not so much guilty of sects and factions, as by education and interest to run in a stream of uncharitable censures of one another, speaking evil of more than they understand, as I have proved in my Cathol. Theolog. about this subject.