A27035:493
A second true defence of the mere nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and…A second true defence of the meer nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and…
A second true defence of the mere nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and history of Dr. Edward Stillingfleet ... clearly proving that it is (not sin but) duty 1. not wilfully to commit the many sins of conformity, 2. not sacrilegiously to forsake the preaching of the Gospel, 3. not to cease public worshipping of God, 4. to use needful pastoral helps for salvation ... / written by Richard Baxter ... ; with some notes on Mr. Joseph Glanviles Zealous and impartial Protestant, and Dr. L. Moulins character.A second true defence of the meer nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and history of Dr. Edward Stillingfleet ... clearly proving that it is (not sin but) duty 1. not wilfully to commit the many sins of conformity, 2. not sacrilegiously to forsake the preaching of the Gospel, 3. not to cease publick worshipping of God, 4. to use needful pastoral helps for salvation ... / written by Richard Baxter ... ; with some notes on Mr. Joseph Glanviles Zealous and impartial Protestant, and Dr. L. Moulins character.
London: printed for Nevil Simons, 1681
AN ANSWER TO Dean STILINGFLEETS, &c. › Chapter 8: What the National Church of England is?
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
CHAP. VIII. What the National Church of England is?
Sect. 1. According to the Doctors Method we come now to the Explication of one of the terms of our Controversy, so long and loudly called for, viz. what the National Church of England is, which we must obey, and from which we are said to separate, p. 287. And the answer is such as may tell Dr. Fulwood and him, that it's time to give over wondering that I understood not what they meant by it.
Sect. 1. ACcording to the Doctors Method we come now to the Explication of one of the terms of our Controversie, so long and loudly called for, viz. what the National Church of England is, which we must obey, and from which we are said to separate, p. 287. And the answer is such as may tell Dr. Fulwood and him, that it's time to give over wondering that I understood not what they meant by it.
Sect. 2. Our question is of the Church Policy and Political Form. All writers of Politics difference a mere Community, from a Political Body: This is essentiated of the two constitutive Parts, the Pars Regens and Pars subdita: the former is much like the Soul, and the later the Body. The Ruling Part is called the Form by most, and the sorts (Monarchical, Aristocratical, Democratical or mixed) the form in Specie, as the rational or sensitive Soul to Animals: But the Relative Form is the Union of both in their proper order. Such a body Politic is a Kingdom, a City, a Church in the proper and usual sense.