A27035:90
A second true defence of the mere nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and…A second true defence of the meer nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and…
A second true defence of the mere nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and history of Dr. Edward Stillingfleet ... clearly proving that it is (not sin but) duty 1. not wilfully to commit the many sins of conformity, 2. not sacrilegiously to forsake the preaching of the Gospel, 3. not to cease public worshipping of God, 4. to use needful pastoral helps for salvation ... / written by Richard Baxter ... ; with some notes on Mr. Joseph Glanviles Zealous and impartial Protestant, and Dr. L. Moulins character.A second true defence of the meer nonconformists against the untrue accusations, reasonings, and history of Dr. Edward Stillingfleet ... clearly proving that it is (not sin but) duty 1. not wilfully to commit the many sins of conformity, 2. not sacrilegiously to forsake the preaching of the Gospel, 3. not to cease publick worshipping of God, 4. to use needful pastoral helps for salvation ... / written by Richard Baxter ... ; with some notes on Mr. Joseph Glanviles Zealous and impartial Protestant, and Dr. L. Moulins character.
London: printed for Nevil Simons, 1681
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Pag. 565. [14. To suppose the books so written to be imperfect, i. e. that any thing necessary to be believed or PRACTISED are not contained in them, is either to charge the first Author of them with fraud, and not delivering his whole mind, or the writers with insincerity in not setting it down, and the whole Christian Church of the first ages with folly, in believing the fullness and perfection of the Scriptures in order to Salvation.
Pag. 565. [14. To suppose the books so written to be imperfect, i. e. that any thing necessary to be believed or PRACTISED are not conteined in them, is either to charge the first Author of them with fraud, and not delivering his whole mind, or the writers with insincerity in not setting it down, and the whole Christian Church of the first ages with folly, in believing the fulness and perfection of the Scriptures in order to Salvation.
Read the rest of those excellent Rules to the end.
In his excellent, Vindication of Arch Bishop La•d, called A Rational account of the Protestants Religion, he hath the same terms of Communion and the same description of Schism with mine, and I know not how better to express my thoughts, nor plead my Vindication, viz.
In his excellent, Vindication of Arch Bishop La•d, called A Rational account of the Protestants Religion, he hath the same termes of Communion and the same description of Schism with mine, and I know not how better to express my thoughts, nor plead my Vindication, viz.