A27045:296
The successive visibility of the church of which the Protestants are the soundest members…
The successive visibility of the church of which the Protestants are the soundest members I. defended against the opposition of Mr. William Johnson, II. proved by many arguments / by Richard Baxter ; whereunto is added 1. an account of my judgement to Mr. J. how far heretics are or are not in the church, 2. Mr. Js. explication of the most used terms, with my queries thereupon, and his answer and my reply, 3. an appendix about successive ordination, 4. letters between me and T.S., a papist, with a narrative of the success.The successive visibility of the church of which the Protestants are the soundest members I. defended against the opposition of Mr. William Johnson, II. proved by many arguments / by Richard Baxter ; whereunto is added 1. an account of my judgement to Mr. J. how far hereticks are or are not in the church, 2. Mr. Js. explication of the most used terms, with my queries thereupon, and his answer and my reply, 3. an appendix about successive ordination, 4. letters between me and T.S., a papist, with a narrative of the success.
London: printed by R.W. for Nevil Simmons, 1660
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3. You say the Popes Legates sate first in Council.] Reply. What then? therefore the Pope was Governor of the Christian world, though not a man out of the Empire were of the Council. Are you still in jest? But if it must be so, then I can prove that others were the Universal Governors, because at Nice, and other Councils they sate before the Legates of the Pope, and in many his Legates had no place. Is this argument ⟨p. 156⟩good think you? O unfaithful partiality in the matters of salvation!
3. You say the Popes Legates sate first in Council.] Reply. What then? therefore the Pope was Governour of the Christian world, though not a man out of the Empire were of the Council. Are you still in jest? But if it must be so, then I can prove that others were the Universal Governours, because at Nice, and other Councils they sate before the Legates of the Pope, and in many his Legats had no place. Is this argument ⟨p. 156⟩good think you? O unfaithful partiality in the matters of salvation!
4. You say, they prohibited Dioscorus to sit by his order] Reply. 1. What then? therefore he was Universal Governor of the Church. All alike. Any accuser in a Parliament or Synod may require that the Accused may not sit as judge, till he be tried. 2. But did you not know that Leo's Legates were not obeyed; but that the Gloriosissimi judices & amplissimus senatus, required that the cause should be first made known: and that it was not done till Eusebius Episcop. Dorylaei had read his bill of complaint? Binnius Act 1. pag. 5.
4. You say, they prohibited Dioscorus to sit by his order] Reply. 1. What then? therefore he was Universal Governour of the Church. All alike. Any accuser in a Parliament or Synod may require that the Accused may not sit as judge, till he be tried. 2. But did you not know that Leo's Legates were not obeyed; but that the Gloriosissimi judices & amplissimus senatus, required that the cause should be first made known: and that it was not done till Eusebius Episcop. Dorylaei had read his bill of complaint? Binnius Act 1. pag. 5.