A27045:475
The successive visibility of the church of which the Protestants are the soundest members…
The successive visibility of the church of which the Protestants are the soundest members I. defended against the opposition of Mr. William Johnson, II. proved by many arguments / by Richard Baxter ; whereunto is added 1. an account of my judgement to Mr. J. how far heretics are or are not in the church, 2. Mr. Js. explication of the most used terms, with my queries thereupon, and his answer and my reply, 3. an appendix about successive ordination, 4. letters between me and T.S., a papist, with a narrative of the success.The successive visibility of the church of which the Protestants are the soundest members I. defended against the opposition of Mr. William Johnson, II. proved by many arguments / by Richard Baxter ; whereunto is added 1. an account of my judgement to Mr. J. how far hereticks are or are not in the church, 2. Mr. Js. explication of the most used terms, with my queries thereupon, and his answer and my reply, 3. an appendix about successive ordination, 4. letters between me and T.S., a papist, with a narrative of the success.
London: printed by R.W. for Nevil Simmons, 1660
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Arg. 4. If there have been since the ⟨p. 242⟩days of Christ, a Christian Church that was not subject to the Roman Pope, as the Vicar of Christ and universal Head and Governor of the Church; then the Church of which the Protestants are members, hath been visible both in its being, and its freedom from Popery. But the Antecedent is true: therefore so is the consequent.
Arg. 4. If there have been since the ⟨p. 242⟩daies of Christ, a Christian Church that was not subject to the Roman Pope, as the Vicar of Christ and universal Head and Governour of the Church; then the Church of which the Protestants are members, hath been visible both in its being, and its freedom from Popery. But the Antecedent is true: therefore so is the consequent.
I shall prove the Antecedent, and therein the visibility of our Church, and the nonexistence in those times of the Papacy.
Arg. 1. My first Argument shall be from the general Council of Chalcedon.