A27045:537
The successive visibility of the church of which the Protestants are the soundest members…
The successive visibility of the church of which the Protestants are the soundest members I. defended against the opposition of Mr. William Johnson, II. proved by many arguments / by Richard Baxter ; whereunto is added 1. an account of my judgement to Mr. J. how far heretics are or are not in the church, 2. Mr. Js. explication of the most used terms, with my queries thereupon, and his answer and my reply, 3. an appendix about successive ordination, 4. letters between me and T.S., a papist, with a narrative of the success.The successive visibility of the church of which the Protestants are the soundest members I. defended against the opposition of Mr. William Johnson, II. proved by many arguments / by Richard Baxter ; whereunto is added 1. an account of my judgement to Mr. J. how far hereticks are or are not in the church, 2. Mr. Js. explication of the most used terms, with my queries thereupon, and his answer and my reply, 3. an appendix about successive ordination, 4. letters between me and T.S., a papist, with a narrative of the success.
London: printed by R.W. for Nevil Simmons, 1660
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
And it is done already so fully, that I provoke the Papists to answer the Catalogues and historical Evidence given in, if they can. If you ask where, I will now only tell you of, 1. Blondel against Perron d• Primatu in Ecclesia (in French) that shows you the torrent of Antiquity against the Papal Sovereignty. 2. Molinaeus (in French) de Novitate Papismi against the same Perron. 3. Bishop Usher, de statu & successione Ecclesiarum, and his Answer to the Jesuits ⟨p. 270⟩challenge. 4. Dr. Field of the Church, who lib. 5. answereth Bellarmines allegations from all sort of Antiquity, which are their strength. I pass by many others, some of which I have named in the foresaid 3. Dispute of the safe Religion: where also I have produced more of this evidence then they can answer. At least much more then you have returned me in your last Paper for the contrary, to which I desire your answer: For its in vain to write one thing so oft.
And it is done already so fully, that I provoke the Papists to answer the Catalogues and historicall Evidence given in, if they can. If you ask where, I will now only tell you of, 1. Blondell against Perron d• Primatu in Ecclesia (in French) that shews you the torrent of Antiquity against the Papal Soveraignty. 2. Molinaeus (in French) de Novitate Papismi against the same Perron. 3. Bishop Vsher, de statu & successione Ecclesiarum, and his Answer to the •esuites ⟨p. 270⟩challenge. 4. Dr. Field of the Church, who lib. 5. answereth Bellarmines allegations from all sort of Antiquity, which are their strength. I pass by many others, some of which I have named in the foresaid 3. Dispute of the safe Religion: where also I have produced more of this evidence then they can answer. At least much more then you have returned me in your last Paper for the contrary, to which I desire your answer: For its in vain to write one thing so oft.