A27058:503
The true history of councils enlarged and defended against the deceits of a pretended…
The true history of councils enlarged and defended against the deceits of a pretended vindicator of the primitive church, but indeed of the tympanite & tyranny of some prelates many hundred years after Christ, with a detection of the false history of Edward Lord Bishop of Cork and Ross in Ireland ... and a preface abbreviating much of Ludolphus's History of Habassta : written to show their dangerous error, who think that a general council, or college of bishops, is a supreme governor of all the Christian world ... / by Richard Baxter ... ; to which is added by another hand, a defence of a book, entitled, No evidence for diocesan churches ...The true history of councils enlarged and defended against the deceits of a pretended vindicator of the primitive church, but indeed of the tympanite & tyranny of some prelates many hundred years after Christ, with a detection of the false history of Edward Lord Bishop of Corke and Rosse in Ireland ... and a preface abbreviating much of Ludolphus's History of Habassta : written to shew their dangerous errour, who think that a general council, or colledge of bishops, is a supream governour of all the Christian world ... / by Richard Baxter ... ; to which is added by another hand, a defence of a book, entituled, No evidence for diocesan churches ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1682
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Answ. 3. Did that man ever understandingly consider the matter, who can doubt of the truth of what I say?
I. On the one side how heinous and many the sins that we fear are, if we should conform, I must not again name, for that's it that provoketh.
11. Now as to the Comparison;
1. I'll appeal to Learned Bishop Barlow whether Mr. Tombs hath not made the Case of Anabaptistry more difficult? Let them that deny it confute him better than I have done.
1. I'le appeal to Learned Bishop Barlow whether Mr. Tombs hath not made the Case of Anabaptistry more difficult? Let them that deny it confute him better than I have done.
2. And why doth none answer the Hungarians book for Polygamy if it be easier done than the task in question. I have known the man that maintained, that if a King had a barren wife, and his Kingdom like to be undone by a destructive successor, he might as lawfully take another wife, as Adams Children might marry incestuously. And indeed the many unreproved instances of Polygamy in Abraham, Jacob, Moses, David, Solomon, &c. will allow men more pretence for it, than ever I saw brought for all (I say, but For all) that I have named in that book.