A27058:810
The true history of councils enlarged and defended against the deceits of a pretended…
The true history of councils enlarged and defended against the deceits of a pretended vindicator of the primitive church, but indeed of the tympanite & tyranny of some prelates many hundred years after Christ, with a detection of the false history of Edward Lord Bishop of Cork and Ross in Ireland ... and a preface abbreviating much of Ludolphus's History of Habassta : written to show their dangerous error, who think that a general council, or college of bishops, is a supreme governor of all the Christian world ... / by Richard Baxter ... ; to which is added by another hand, a defence of a book, entitled, No evidence for diocesan churches ...The true history of councils enlarged and defended against the deceits of a pretended vindicator of the primitive church, but indeed of the tympanite & tyranny of some prelates many hundred years after Christ, with a detection of the false history of Edward Lord Bishop of Corke and Rosse in Ireland ... and a preface abbreviating much of Ludolphus's History of Habassta : written to shew their dangerous errour, who think that a general council, or colledge of bishops, is a supream governour of all the Christian world ... / by Richard Baxter ... ; to which is added by another hand, a defence of a book, entituled, No evidence for diocesan churches ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1682
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But when I largely recited Hillary's words of them, he saith, [The Account is very sad] (and what said I more?) But, saith he, yet such as shows rather the Calamity, than the Fault of the Bishops.]
But when I largely recited Hillary's words of them, he saith, [The Account is very sad] (and what said I more?) But, saith he, yet such as shews rather the Calamity, than the Fault of the Bishops.]
Answ. Nay then, no doubt, it's no fault to Conform. Hillary then, and all that kept their ground, were in a great fault for so heavily accusing them. And so the World turned Arians in show (as Hierom and Hillary speak) is much acquit, and the Nonconformists are the faulty Railers for accusing them. It had been enough to say, It was no Crime; but to say, no Fault, is too gentle for the same man that so talked of Perjured Arians before.
Answ. Nay then, no doubt, it's no fault to Conform. Hillary then, and all that kept their ground, were in a great fault for so heavily accusing them. And so the World turned Arians in shew (as Hierom and Hillary speak) is much acquit, and the Nonconformists are the faulty Railers for accusing them. It had been enough to say, It was no Crime; but to say, no Fault, is too gentle for the same man that so talkt of Perjured Arians before.
§ 15. Yet because he is forced to confess that it was most by far of all the Bishops, even in Councils (he of Rome not excepted) ⟨p. 135⟩that thus fell, he must show how it offended him to be forced to it, by telling the world how contentious I have been against all sorts and Sects (the first is false, and he knows it I think, and the latter is true formally of a Sect as such; even his own Sect.) And some judge me such a stranger to Peace, as to need a Moderator to stand between me and the Contradictions of my own Books.]