A27064:279
Universal redemption of mankind, by the Lord Jesus Christ stated and cleared by the…
Universal redemption of mankind, by the Lord Jesus Christ stated and cleared by the late learned Mr. Richard Barter [sic] ; whereunto is added a short account of Special redemption, by the same author.
London: printed for John Salusbury, 1694
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. If Christ was not threatened by the Law, (or if it threatened none but ipsum delinquentem;) then Christs sufferings were not the fulfilling of the threat: (for he was not the delinquent) But, &c. Ergo, &c.
1. If Christ was not threatned by the Law, (or if it threatned none but ipsum delinquentem;) then Christs sufferings were not the fulfilling of the threat: (for he was not the delinquent) But, &c. Ergo, &c.
2. If Christ therefore suffered to relax the Law, and that its threatening might not be fulfilled, then his sufferings were not the fulfilling of the Law. But, &c. Ergo, &c. Prob. Min. that the Law knoweth no other satisfaction, but fulfilling.
2. If Christ therefore suffered to relax the Law, and that its threatning might not be fulfilled, then his sufferings were not the fulfilling of the Law. But, &c. Ergo, &c. Prob. Min. that the Law knoweth no other satisfaction, but fulfilling.
Argu. 1. Satisfaction strictly (as distinct from fulfilling) is Redditio aequivalentis. But the Law, (as continuing the same) cannot commute or substitute the aequivalens vel tantundem, for the Idem or proper Debt.