A27064:541
Universal redemption of mankind, by the Lord Jesus Christ stated and cleared by the…
Universal redemption of mankind, by the Lord Jesus Christ stated and cleared by the late learned Mr. Richard Barter [sic] ; whereunto is added a short account of Special redemption, by the same author.
London: printed for John Salusbury, 1694
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. Sadeel is full this way, Adversus humanas Satisfactions, p 211. he saith, [Aut Christus merito mortis suae delet culpam peccatorum venialium (ut vocant) aut non delet; Si dicant, non delere: Ergo Christus non pro omnibus peccatis mortuus est, sed tantum pro mortalibus. O blasphemos homines si quidem id dixerint! & quid est aliud delere ac remittere culpam ejus peccati, quod ex ipsorum sententia poenas temporales promeretur, quam nullas exigere poenas temporales propter illud peccatum promeritas. Nesciunt profectò isti homines quid sit peccati culpa, nec advertunt poenam peccati non posse definiri absque mention culpae. (So that sin it self may be said so far to be pardoned, as the punishment is remitted: and therefore he saith it was only the punishment and not the fault that Christ bore) p. 215. At quomodo Christus satisfecit Deo pro peccatis nostris, An non id factum est quia Christus peccatorum nostrorum, non culpam pertulit sed poenam. Sic. p. 228. Nam Chrisius (ut nostram non nostris, sed Augustini verbis explicemus sententiam) suscipiendo poenam & non suscipiendo culpam, & culpam delevit & poenam.]
2. Sadeel is full this way, Adversus humanas Satisfactiones, p 211. he saith, [Aut Christus merito mortis suae delet culpam peccatorum venialium (ut vocant) aut non delet; Si dicant, non delere: Ergo Christus non pro omnibus peccatis mortuus est, sed tantum pro mortalibus. O blasphemos homines si quidem id dixerint! & quid est aliud delere ac remittere culpam ejus peccati, quod ex ipsorum sententia poenas temporales promeretur, quam nullas exigere poenas temporales propter illud peccatum promeritas. Nesciunt profectò isti homines quid sit peccati culpa, nec advertunt poenam peccati non posse definiri absque mentione culpae. (So that sin it self may be said so far to be pardoned, as the punishment is remitted: and therefore he saith it was only the punishment and not the fault that Christ bore) p. 215. At quomodo Christus satisfecit Deo pro peccatis nostris, An non id factum est quia Christus peccatorum nostrorum, non culpam pertulit sed poenam. Sic. p. 228. Nam Chrisius (ut nostram non nostris, sed Augustini verbis explicemus sententiam) suscipiendo poenam & non suscipiendo culpam, & culpam delevit & poenam.]
3. So Chamier at large, shows that it is only through Christ's Satisfaction that fault or punishment is remitted, and that God cannot remit without satisfaction, Tom. 3. l. 23. c. 2. § 22. Itaque in genere concedo, non posse Deum impunita peccata