A27064:919
Universal redemption of mankind, by the Lord Jesus Christ stated and cleared by the…
Universal redemption of mankind, by the Lord Jesus Christ stated and cleared by the late learned Mr. Richard Barter [sic] ; whereunto is added a short account of Special redemption, by the same author.
London: printed for John Salusbury, 1694
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Here these Apostates are said to crucify the Son of God afresh [Greek or Hebrew] It is not barely to crucify Christ again, but to crucify him to themselves again: That is, either finaliter (as some expound it) or efficienter (as others) which way soever it be, it is not efficaciter, but quantum in se.
Here these Apostates are said to crucifie the Son of God afresh 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 It is not barely to crucifie Christ again, but to crucifie him to themselves again: That is, either finaliter (as some expound it) or efficienter (as others) which way soever it be, it is not efficaciter, but quantum in se.
1. If it be the first, then the meaning is this: If such be saved, then it must be by a new Sacrifice, and so they bring themselves into that case that Christs Death on the terms that first it was accepted, will not serve to save them, ⟨p. 332⟩(because he died not to satisfy for that sin.) So Paraeus expoundeth it; sed quomodo hoc faciendo Christum denuò crucifigunt sibimetipsis? Quia filium Dei semel crucifixum abnegando, nolunt salvari ejus morte ex qua sola dependet resipiscentia & salus. Si igitur resipiscere & servari deberent, denuò crucifigendus esset eis Christus; quod est impossibile, quia amplius mori non potest. Sic infra cap. 10. Videtur declarare, non est eis reliqua hostia pro peccato postquam unicam Christi hostiam semel abjecerunt & conculcarunt. Impossible igitur est eos resipiscere & servari.
1. If it be the first, then the meaning is this: If such be saved, then it must be by a new Sacrifice, and so they bring themselves into that case that Christs Death on the terms that first it was accepted, will not serve to save them, ⟨p. 332⟩(because he died not to satisfie for that sin.) So Paraeus expoundeth it; sed quomodo hoc faciendo Christum denuò crucifigunt sibimetipsis? Quia filium Dei semel crucifixum abnegando, nolunt salvari ejus morte ex qua sola dependet resipiscentia & salus. Si igitur resipiscere & servari deberent, denuò crucifigendus esset eis Christus; quod est impossibile, quia amplius mori non potest. Sic infra cap. 10. Videtur declarare, non est eis reliqua hostia pro peccato postquam unicam Christi hostiam semel abjecerunt & conculcarunt. Impossible igitur est eos resipiscere & servari.