Universal redemption of mankind, by the Lord Jesus Christ stated and cleared by the…

Now if their sin (as the pro-causa meritoria) had no hand in his Death at first, how can they be therefore remediless for endeavouring it a second time? For it was but once by them. And if the same sin was pardonable in those that not only in desire but in act, did put him to Death, viz. the Jews; then it appears that it was a pardonable sin: And that the same sin, ⟨p. 334⟩(nay the Conatus or mere desire of it) which was pardonable then, should become unpardonable since, as it is a fancy, and hath no Scripture proof; so it is apparently false, seeing it supposeth that the Law of Christ is not now the same as then, which is false.

Now if their sin (as the pro-causa meritoria) had no hand in his Death at first, how can they be therefore remediless for endeavouring it a second time? For it was but once by them. And if the same sin was pardonable in those that not only in desire but in act, did put him to Death, viz. the Jews; then it appears that it was a pardonable sin: And that the same sin, ⟨p. 334⟩(nay the Conatus or meer desire of it) which was pardonable then, should become unpardonable since, as it is a fancy, and hath no Scripture proof; so it is apparently false, seeing it supposeth that the Law of Christ is not now the same as then, which is false.

A second Argument for Universal satisfaction, this Text affordeth us: Christ satisfied for all those who are enlightened, and have tasted of the Heavenly Gift, and are made partakers of the Holy Ghost, &c. But some Non-Elect are such: Therefore Christ satisfied for some Non Elect, and consequently for all.

A second Argument for Universal satisfaction, this Text affordeth us: Christ satisfied for all those who are inlightened, and have tasted of the Heavenly Gift, and are made partakers of the Holy Ghost, &c. But some Non-Elect are such: Therefore Christ satisfied for some Non Elect, and consequently for all.