A29375:114
The truth of the times vindicated whereby the lawfulness of Parliamentary proceedings in taking…The truth of the times vindicated whereby the lawfulnesse of Parliamentary procedings in taking…
The truth of the times vindicated whereby the lawfulness of Parliamentary proceedings in taking up of arms, is justified, Doctor Ferns reply answered, and the case in question more fully resolved / by William Bridge ...The truth of the times vindicated whereby the lawfulnesse of Parliamentary procedings in taking up of arms, is justified, Doctor Fernes reply answered, and the case in question more fully resolved / by William Bridge ...
London: printed by T.P. and M.S. for Ben. Allen, 1643
Title page typeset from the transcription.
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE READER. › Chapter 4AN INTRODVCTION TO THE READER. › Chapter 4
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Then whereas that Scripture is urged (though not to take up Arms against our King as the Doctor suggests) 1 Chron. 1219. Where it is said expressly, that David went out to Battle against Saul, the Dr. Replies Desperate shifts that these men are put to, when pretences and simulations, must be Scripture ground for Co science. It's said before that David made show •f madness before King Achish. Mr. Bridge might as well infer▪ therefore he was mad.
Then whereas that Scripture is urged (though not to take up Armes against our King as the Doctor suggests) 1 Chron. 1219. Where it is said expresly, that David went out to Battell against Saul, the Dr. Replies Desperate shifesthat thesemen are put to, when pretences and simulations, must bee Scripture ground for Co science. It's said before that David made shew •f madnesse before King Achish. Mr. Bridge might as well inferre▪ therefore he was mad.
Answ. Will any else besides this Dr. make such an inference? The Scripture faith, totidem verbis that he went out to Battle against Saul that this was but a simulation is not said in Scripture, but the Scripture doth not say that David was mad, but that he feigned himself so; is there then the same reason of the one and the other?
Answ. Will any else besides this Dr. make such an inference? The Scripture faith, totidem verbis that he went out to Battell against Saul that this was but a simulation is not said in Scripture, but the Scripture doth not say that David was mad, but that he fained himselfe so; is there then the same reason of the one and the other?