A29375:144
The truth of the times vindicated whereby the lawfulness of Parliamentary proceedings in taking…The truth of the times vindicated whereby the lawfulnesse of Parliamentary procedings in taking…
The truth of the times vindicated whereby the lawfulness of Parliamentary proceedings in taking up of arms, is justified, Doctor Ferns reply answered, and the case in question more fully resolved / by William Bridge ...The truth of the times vindicated whereby the lawfulnesse of Parliamentary procedings in taking up of arms, is justified, Doctor Fernes reply answered, and the case in question more fully resolved / by William Bridge ...
London: printed by T.P. and M.S. for Ben. Allen, 1643
Title page typeset from the transcription.
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE READER. › Chapter 5AN INTRODVCTION TO THE READER. › Chapter 5
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
I said not so, but that there is a difference between things disposed by way of donation or sale and things disposed of by way of trust: Things disposed of by way of sale or donation are not in our power to recall, things disposed of by way of trust are in our power to look to when the trust is neglected: I would this Doctor would but do us the favour as to allege our words rightly.
I said not so, but that there is a difference between things disposed by way of donation or sale and things disposed of by way of trust: Things disposed of by way of sale or donation are not in our power to recall, things disposed of by way of trust are in our power to look to when the trust is neglected: I would this Doctor would but doe us the favour as to alledge our words rightly.
The 67. and 68. of his Book, are spent in proving assertions of the same things that he had said before only pag. 67. he confesseth it is likely that Kings were at first by election, which acknowledgement we receive: but how doth this agree with what he had said before Sect. 3. pag. 8, 9 where he had said, that election was a defection from that government that God set up at the first; In the 69. pag. he cometh to the matter of the Kings Covenant and Oath, which (saith the Doctor) is no condition on which the Kings of this Land are admitted to the Crown, but a confirmation and strengthening of their mutual duties by Oaths and promises, as it was with the Kings of Israel.
The 67. and 68. of his Book, are spent in proving assertions of the same things that he had sayd before onely pag. 67. he confesseth it is likely that Kings were at first by election, which acknowledgement we receive: but how doth this agree with what he had said before Sect. 3. pag. 8, 9 where he had said, that election was a defection from that government that God set up at the first; In the 69. pag. he commeth to the matter of the Kings Covenant and Oath, which (saith the Doctor) is no condition on which the Kings of this Land are admitted to the Crown, but a confirmation and strengthening of their mutuall duties by Oaths and promises, as it was with the Kings of Israel.