A29375:164
The truth of the times vindicated whereby the lawfulness of Parliamentary proceedings in taking…The truth of the times vindicated whereby the lawfulnesse of Parliamentary procedings in taking…
The truth of the times vindicated whereby the lawfulness of Parliamentary proceedings in taking up of arms, is justified, Doctor Ferns reply answered, and the case in question more fully resolved / by William Bridge ...The truth of the times vindicated whereby the lawfulnesse of Parliamentary procedings in taking up of arms, is justified, Doctor Fernes reply answered, and the case in question more fully resolved / by William Bridge ...
London: printed by T.P. and M.S. for Ben. Allen, 1643
Title page typeset from the transcription.
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE READER. › Chapter 6AN INTRODVCTION TO THE READER. › Chapter 6
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But you prove a Power in the Body politic, saith the Doctor, to disburden it self (at the Church hath) of evil Members, as Papists do.
But you prove a Power in the Body politick, saith the Doctor, to disburthen it selfe (at the Church hath) of evill Members, as Papists doe.
An. But not as the Papists: for we only press a necessity of Power in the body, to defend and save it self from the injury of Princes; they plead for a power in the Church, (& who that Church is you know) to depose Princes; but then saith the Drs. hath this Church a power of excommunication still; so it should be indeed, but since the Act which took away the High Commission; and (as the party you plead for would have it interpreted) all Ecclesiastical Censure too, where doth the exercise of that power rest, upon, whom now is the Argument turned? page 73.
An. But not as the Papists: for we onely presse a necessity of Power in the body, to defend and save it selfe from the injury of Princes; they plead for a power in the Church, (& who that Church is you know) to depose Princes; but then saith the Drs. hath this Church a power of excōmunication still; so it should be indeed, but since the Act which tooke away the High Commission; and (as the party you plead for would have it interpreted) all Ecclesiasticall Censure too, where doth the exercise of that power rest, upon, whom now is the Argument turned? page 73.
An. Surely upon your self, for there is no Church of Christ, but whilst it remains a Church hath a power left in it (though the exercise may be long suspended) to see to it self, and its own preservation, I say a power from Christ to excommunicate, though it should be denied from men; and it seems a strange thing to me, that the Churches of England have no power left, because the High Commission