A30238:708
An expository comment, doctrinal, controversial, and practical upon the whole first chapter to the…An expository comment, doctrinal, controversal, and practical upon the whole first chapter to the…
An expository comment, doctrinal, controversial, and practical upon the whole first chapter to the second epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians by Anthony Burgess ...An expository comment, doctrinal, controversal, and practical upon the whole first chapter to the second epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians by Anthony Burgesse ...
London: printed by A.M. for Abel Roper, 1661
AN EXPOSITION WITH Practical Observations UPON THE First Chapter of… › Sermon 31
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
That God is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.1
- 1God is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Which truth shall be first explicated, and confirmed Doctrinally, and then illustrated Practically. As for the Doctrinal part, the Socinians they have raised up much dust, and have obscured the point, with their subtle heretical depravations. ⟨p. 136⟩For whereas the Church of God formerly did believe Christ to be the Son of the Father by eternal generation: They deny this reason, and assert some new ones of their own invention. Yea, and the Remonstrants also, though they assert Christs Sonship from the Father by eternal generation, yet they affirm also a second way of communication of this Sonship, and that is, By a gracious vouchsafing of supreme power and glory to him. So that they must acknowledge two filiations in Christ, the one Eternal, by that secret and ineffable generation; the other Temporal, or in time, viz. A gracious communication of supreme power and glory to him. But this is false, as is to be showed. But to explain this, Consider,
Which truth shall be first explicated, and confirmed Doctrinally, and then illustrated Practically. As for the Doctrinal part, the Socinians they have raised up much dust, and have obscured the point, with their subtill heretical depravations. ⟨p. 136⟩For whereas the Church of God formerly did believe Christ to be the Son of the Father by eternal generation: They deny this reason, and assert some new ones of their own invention. Yea, and the Remonstrants also, though they assert Christs Sonship from the Father by eternal generation, yet they affirm also a second way of communication of this Sonship, and that is, By a gracious vouchsafing of supream power and glory to him. So that they must acknowledge two filiations in Christ, the one Eternal, by that secret and ineffable generation; the other Temporal, or in time, viz. A gracious communication of supream power and glory to him. But this is false, as is to be shewed. But to explain this, Consider,