A30238:85
An expository comment, doctrinal, controversial, and practical upon the whole first chapter to the…An expository comment, doctrinal, controversal, and practical upon the whole first chapter to the…
An expository comment, doctrinal, controversial, and practical upon the whole first chapter to the second epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians by Anthony Burgess ...An expository comment, doctrinal, controversal, and practical upon the whole first chapter to the second epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians by Anthony Burgesse ...
London: printed by A.M. for Abel Roper, 1661
AN EXPOSITION WITH Practical Observations UPON THE First Chapter of… › Sermon 3
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
This truth about the Canonical Authority of this Book, and the rest in the Bible, is of very great concernment, not only because of the weighty controversies and disputes both of old, and alate herein; but also because of a practical consideration. For though men do generally profess themselves to be Christians, and say, They acknowledge the holy Bible, as of Divine Authority, yet where is the man almost, that liveth, as if he did believe it to be a true Book? For doth any wicked man, that goeth on in his impenitent ways, believe the Word of God to be true, that condemneth him, that forbids and threatens his ways, that tells him assuredly, that if it be true, and the Word of God, without reformation, he will be as assuredly damned, as if he were in Hell already? Can a man then believe this to be Gods Word, and yet be so desperately mad, as to live in a full contrariety to it? If therefore this very Epistle be received as the Word of God, that it's no Apocryphal or humane Invention, but Paul wrote it, as inspired and directed by the Holy Ghost. How can ye, how dare ye reject the counsel and admonitions contained therein, both as you are a Church, and as you are particular persons?
This truth about the Canonical Authority of this Book, and the rest in the Bible, is of very great concernment, not only because of the weighty controversies and disputes both of old, and alate herein; but also because of a practical consideration. For though men do generally profess themselves to be Christians, and say, They acknowledge the holy Bible, as of Divine Authority, yet where is the man almost, that liveth, as if he did believe it to be a true Book? For doth any wicked man, that goeth on in his impenitent wayes, believe the Word of God to be true, that condemneth him, that forbids and threatens his wayes, that tels him assuredly, that if it be true, and the Word of God, without reformation, he will be as assuredly damned, as if he were in Hell already? Can a man then believe this to be Gods Word, and yet be so desperately mad, as to live in a full contrariety to it? If therefore this very Epistle be received as the Word of God, that it's no Apocryphal or humane Invention, but Paul wrote it, as inspired and directed by the Holy Ghost. How can ye, how dare ye reject the counsel and admonitions contained therein, both as you are a Church, and as you are particular persons?