CXLV expository sermons upon the whole 17th chapter of the Gospel according to St.…

This seemeth to be very specious and plausible. But

First, Grant that we should interpret the Oneness spoken of in the Text of consent in Will and Agreement, as Calvin doth, yet it doth not follow, that other places speaking of their Oneness should be also understood in the same manner, yea from the Oneness of Will between the Father and Son, is necessarily inferred the Oneness of their nature: So that although we should understand this principally of Unity in accord, yet by consequence it would prove Unity of Nature; for in free Agents, where there is the same will, there there is also the same nature; where there is the same humane will, there is the same humane nature; and where is the same divine will, there is the same divine nature, indeed with men it's the same specific nature, not numerical; but because there is one God only, therefore it must be the same numerical nature.

First, Grant that we should interpret the Onenesse spoken of in the Text of consent in Will and Agreement, as Calvin doth, yet it doth not follow, that other places speaking of their Onenesse should be also understood in the same manner, yea from the Onenesse of Will between the Father and Sonne, is necessarily inferred the Onenesse of their nature: So that although we should understand this principally of Unity in accord, yet by consequence it would prove Unity of Nature; for in free Agents, where there is the same will, there there is also the same nature; where there is the same humane will, there is the same humane nature; and where is the same divine will, there is the same divine nature, indeed with men it's the same specifical nature, not numerical; but because there is one God onely, therefore it must be the same numerical nature.

But in the second place, We are to take the Unity of the Father and the Son, in as large a sense (at least not to exclude it) as in other places it is. Now in other places, especially