A30247:224
A treatise of original sin ... proving that it is
A treatise of original sin ... proving that it is, by pregnant texts of Scripture vindicated from false glosses / by Anthony Burgess.
London : s.n., 1658
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
SECT. IV.
And first, Grotius rejects this Interpretation of Original, sin, as nothing to the Apostles meaning, and therefore saith the word [Greek or Hebrew], is as much as [Greek or Hebrew], truly and indeed, opposite to what is in opinion, and esteem, comparing this place with Gal. 4. 8. Which by nature are no gods. In this, following Pelagius his Exposition of old, as if he would take his error by imitation, as Pelagius said, we did sin from Adam. This interpretation of Pelagius taking prorsus for the same with nature. Austin refuseth for the novelty of it, Lib. 6. contra Julia, cap. 4. and indeed nothing now is more ordinary, then such an Exposition with the Adversaries to original sin, as Castellio and others.
ANd first, Gretius rejects this Interpretation of Original, sinne, as nothing to the Apostles meaning, and therefore saith the word 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, is as much as 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, truly and indeed, opposite to what is in opinion, and esteem, comparing this place with Gal. 4. 8. Which by nature are no gods. In this, following Pelagius his Exposition of old, as if he would take his errour by imitation, as Pelagius said, we did sinne from Adam. This interpretation of Pelagius taking prorsus for the same with nature. Austin refuseth for the novelty of it, Lib. 6. contra Julia, cap. 4. and indeed nothing now is more ordinary, then such an Exposition with the Adversaries to original sinne, as Castellio and others.