A30248:593
The true doctrine of justification asserted and vindicated, from the errors of Papists, Arminians,…The true doctrine of justification asserted and vindicated, from the errours of Papists, Arminians,…
The true doctrine of justification asserted and vindicated, from the errors of Papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially Antinomians in XXX lectures preached at Lawrence-Jury, London / by Anthony Burgess ...The true doctrine of justification asserted and vindicated, from the errours of Papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially Antinomians in XXX lectures preached at Lawrence-Iury, London / by Anthony Burgess ...
London: printed by A. Miller for Tho. Underhill, 1651
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1And if the Question be made, Whether the phrase of covering sin, make for that error, That God doth not see sin in believers offending?
1And if the Question be made, Whether the phrase of covering sinne, make for that errour, That God doth not see sin in beleevers offending?
- 1Whether the phrase of Gods covering sin, favour the error, That God seeth not sin in believers. Answer negative.Whether the phrase of Gods covering sinne, favour the errour, That God seeth not sinne in beleevers. Answer negative.
I answer, No, by no means; for these Reasons,
First, Gods covering of sin is to be limited only to condemnation, as I have proved; Davids sin was at the same time open to God, and covered; open to fatherly chastisements, covered to revengeful condemnation. God did see it as a Father to be angry with him, not as a Judge to hate him.
First, Gods covering of sinne is to be limited only to condemnation, as I have proved; Davids sinne was at the same time open to God, and covered; open to fatherly chastisements, covered to revengefull condemnation. God did see it as a Father to be angry with him, not as a Judge to hate him.